Jul
30
2009
0

Valley of the Dolls review

"VALLEY OF THE DOLLS: PECULIAR EDITION"
    MOVIE: ** (out of 5 stars)

    DVD EXPERIENCE: ****1/2 (out of 5 stars)

    Barbara Parkins as ANNE WELLES

    Patty Duke as NEELY O’HARA

    Paul Burke as LYON BURKE

    Sharon Tate as JENNIFER NORTH POLAR

    Tony Scotti as TONY POLAR

    Martin Milner as MEL ANDERSON

    Charles Drake as KEVIN GILMORE

    Alex Davion as TED CASABLANCA

    Lee Grant as MIRIAM POLAR

    Susan Hayward as HELEN LAWSON

    Rated PG-13
    Studio: 20th Century Fox

    Directed by: Mark Robson

Click here for FREE movie reviews in your email - and get Kevin Carr's pick of the Top 7 Sci-Fi/Horror films of all time FREE!

I was too young to see “Valley of the Dolls” when if first came out in the theaters. Come to value of it, I wasn’t even to be conceived until three years later. So, not gloaming existing at this time, I’m at a loss to arrange the era of the 60s.
Even as a film buff, I go to the wall to get the 60s at times. Show me any film from any other era and, while I may or may not like it, I can at least digest and recognize it. However, the 60s is an enigma to me. There are some films that are great. Some that are not so great. But the 60s offers films to me that I lately don’t understand. Examples of these quintessential films with 60s sensibilities include the original “Casino Royale” and “In Mould Flint.”

After absolutely seeing “Valley of the Dolls,” I add it to this list.

“Valley of the Dolls” wasn’t just a theatrical hit, but a literary leave an impression as well. It’s tranquil one of the largest selling books of all time, and it titillated a establishment. The film, while reviled by author Jacqueline Susann, touched the people of the time.

I, how on earth, just didn’t get it.

That’s doubtlessly because I grew up in an age when Hollywood starlets were constantly found embroiled in a in the seventh heaven of sex and drugs. It’s because the subject thing of the film is not longer scandalous. Undoubtedly, the scandals can again be parlayed into positive marketing of a personality if it’s done by the honourable publicist.

“Valley of the Dolls” tells the recital of three immature, pretty and mostly unspoiled women who seek their dreams in the humankind of recreation. Barbara Parkins is Anne Welles, a nice skirt from New England who ends up individual of the top fashion models. Patty Duke is Neely O’Hara, a cute girl from Pittsburgh who becomes a singing and acting sensation. Sharon Tate plays the doomed Jennifer, a beauty who knows she only has a body to her depend on, and no endowment. All three girls end up achieving their dreams, but falling into a downward spiral of drugs, scandal and sex.

It’s an okay argue, but it still is weighted down with so much of the 60s that I find it hard to relate. Vegas style Davenport bars, charged performances on telethons and Broadway shows with songs more planting trees style this film outside of my support tastes.

The DVD magnify-disc set actually offers more interesting material than the steam itself. The extended documentary “Gotta Get Off This Merry-Go-Draw: Sex, Dolls And Showtunes” spends more time explaining the fascinate to the film to be protracted queens and gay men (which leads me to feel my straightness may be the reason I didn’t like the movie) than talking connected with the film itself. Done, I originate this to be the most fascinating chiefly of the corroborate.
The two discs offer plenty of special features, including a explosion-up trivia railroad and commentary by Barbara Parkins and E!’s Ted Casablanca. There’s divinity-awfully tiring 60s TV shows more the film and reserve, as well as multiple modern featurettes on the second disc. Other features encompass up till galleries, a karaoke soundtrack and rare screen tests.

Wholly the prime features, there’s some talk around remaking the moving picture for a modish audience. However, this is a rash impression. The remake angle has been tried several times, most notably a TV movie in the 80s and a late-twilight soap in the 90s. Both resulted in absolute disasters.

My advice to 20th Century Fox is to leave well satisfactorily along. It’s a slice of 60s strut that is being sent up fine by the folks at Theater A-Go-Go and drag queens’ DVD players around the country. “Valley of the Dolls” is a obscure that reeks of the 60s, that belongs in the 60s. It won’t necessarily translate into the modern age shell of a spoof dig “The Brady Bunch Movie” more than ten years ago.

Specifications: Dolby Digital Surround Sound. Widescreen (2.35:1), enhanced for 16×9 televisions. Spanish language capture. French and Spanish subtitles. English language subtitles for the hearing impaired.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
29
2009
0

Eva (1962)

Eva is Joseph Losey's 1963 feature in a sham, philandering Welsh writer named Tyvian Jones (Stanley Baker), whose involvement with the mysterious Eve (Jeanne Moreau) becomes an all-consuming obsession. Round when he learns she is a prostitute motivated on the other hand by her own interests, he continues to search for her favor as his life collapses around him. The dispassionate-hearted Period before toys with him at length, fruitful him with little and ultimately costing him his original mate Francesca (Virna Lisi), his friends and his life's work.

Losey's film was shot in Italy, primarily in English sprinkled with occasional subtitled Italian. His cinematographers pay loving attention to the famous architecture of Venice, with domes, columns and spacious paved squares providing the backdrop for this cautionary tale of human imperfection and failure. The video has a fashionably composed further de-glamorized look&#8212the actors are oft photographed under unsympathetic lighting, and some of the equity players recall Fellini's famous grotesques. Mirrors, staircases and glasses around as frames and prisms to go to the action, and Losey's unusually mobile camera moves smoothly and precisely from one carefully chosen angle to another. Most importantly, the stylishness is not without purpose&#8212it supports and complements the action, establishing the high-strung tone of each scene without drawing undue attention to itself.

The lead performances are riveting and not at all what one power expect. Jeanne Moreau gives an disturbing, indecorous, subtly shocking dispatch as Eve, who seems to carry an entire history of abuse and abandonment beneath her hardened, sensitivity-shadowed outward. Stanley Baker commits to his character's considerable upright weaknesses, endowing Tyvian with a antagonist, bullheaded, but high water understandable constancy to ruin his life. The supporting actors are qualified, if a mean stiff and stereotyped, supplying a credible context instead of the film's tragicomic, soap opera-ish story arc. Lip-synch is occasionally misguided a morsel, quite due to despatch-production looping problems.

Kino Video's dual-layered DVD features two conclude versions of Eva&#8212the 103-minute (01:43:22) US release variant, and Joseph Losey's native "Complete Director's Cut" that runs 119 minutes (01:59:11). The longer type is charmed from the "only surviving print" (according to the keepcase copy) with Swedish/Finnish subtitles, and unfortunately is in poor condition compared to the US story; see the Image and Audio reviews by reason of details. Both versions of the coating feature the notwithstanding hybrid allotment and ending, but Losey's construct features a more stylish credits sequence, extended versions of a few scenes and several valuable capacity fitting development scenes missing in the shorter version. There are a few minor editing differences, and at least a specific shot is seen in the shorter version but NOT in the extended dice. Losey reportedly disowned the producers' shorter line cut, and it's a shame his original vision has been partially wasted to the ages.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
27
2009
0

K-19: The Widowmaker Posted b…

K-19: The Widowmaker

Posted by

Moe


,   Aug 10, 2002

The year is 1961, a year believed by historians to be the most dangerous of all because the United States and Soviet Union?s Cold War relations are at an all time low. Mother Russia has enough nuclear weapons to destroy the world twice over whereas the United States has five times that amount; with a backdrop like that, coupled with Liam Neeson and Harrison Ford at the helm, what more could you ask for?


Genre:

Action, Adventure, Drama, Thriller


Cast:

Harrison Ford, Liam Neeson, Joss Ackland, J.J. Field, Lex Shrapnel


Director(s):

Kathryn Bigelow


Producer(s):

Joni Sighvatsson, Christine Whitaker, Kathryn Bigelow, Moritz Borman, Edward S. Feldman


Writer(s):

Christopher Kyle, Louis Nowra, William Broyles, Jr., Chris Kyle


Official Site:

http://www.k19movie.com/


Rated:

PG-13

for disturbing images


Length:

140 minutes


Released:

Jul 19, 2002

The Widowmaker


Stars:

4.5 out of 5

As I?ve stated many times before, I take great pleasure in viewing films with war-related subjects. Six months ago, I could barely contain myself when I saw the first trailer for ?K-19: The Widowmaker?. At first glance it appeared to be a story loosely based on the ?Kursk? incident, but after reading-up on the film, I was shocked to find out that it was entirely based on a true story. Considering the subject matter covered by director Kathryn Bigelow and Paramount studios, I can tell you that there must be some very unhappy socialists in the Kremlin these days with the K-19 story out in the open for masses to see.

The story starts off with Mikhail Polenin (Liam Neeson) trying to complete the K-19 on time and as the opening sequences roll by, Kathryn Bigelow expertly exemplifies the urgency felt by the communist party to complete and deploy the K-19. As the story progresses, we see Alexi Vostrikov (Harrison Ford) make references to the K-19, referring to it as the ?pride? of the Soviet Navy. But, even after all is said and done, we are still left in the proverbial darkness, not really knowing why, or by whom the boat was rushed into operation. Based on the events and political struggle of the time, one can only assume the motive to be fear, and be that as it may, additional attention to this particular idiosyncrasy might have accented the story nicely. Bigelow, however, rushes to the climatic reactor problems and skips a lot of the underlying plot development needed to build a believable foundation for the story; an extra 20 minutes spent on Captains Polenin and Vostrikov, or on the Navy?s agenda would have made ?K-19? so much more than the typical, one-dimensional submarine disaster film.

It is inevitable that some of the amateur critics will have something to say over Harrison Ford?s and Liam Neeson?s ?Kevin Costner? moments, moments where the actors seem to intermittently lose and then regain their accents. British and Aussie accents may be one thing to mimic, but a Russian one is far more difficult to master, and, in the end, both Ford and Neeson develop passable Russian accents, making it hardly worth the effort to nit-pick over a few individual scenes.

The biggest selling factor in ?K-19? is the brutally honest approach that Bigelow uses to retell the events of 1961 and how it personifies the possible impact that the goings on might have had on the rest of the world. Thanks to the calm, collective thinking of Captains Polenin and Vostrikov, a potential nuclear disaster was averted. As demonstrated in ?The Sum of All Fears,? once a first strike occurs, there is very little hope of preventing an all-out nuclear war, and, if I might digress for a moment to further prove my point, what exactly was the first thing the US did after regaining their collective breath following the 9/11 attack? Precisely?they went searching for someone to bomb, to point a finger at, as they sought vengeance.

Despite the shortcomings in its back-story, ?K-19? certainly entertains and terrifies viewers at the same time. Whether it is the curse of the bottle bouncing off the hull during the christening, the leaking gasket that caused the sub to surface on her port side, the lack of radiation suits for the core workers, the nine men that died during construction in dry dock, or the Kremlin?s response to radiation poisoning, ?[give] the men some fruit?. Paramount pictures, Kathryn Bigelow, Liam Neeson, and Harrison Ford bring it all together to stretch the boundaries of comprehension when it comes to disaster recovery during times of high alert. Had this happened with an American submarine, military officials would have soon found themselves on Death Row.

Movies based on true stories are my Achilles Heel of film critiquing. You can?t really rip them to shreds because the story wasn?t plausible as the events actually took place and it becomes virtually impossible to ignore idiosyncrasies that detract from the film?s overall presentation. So how does one review movies based on factual events? Well, as the technique is classified Omega 17 here at Espy, I could tell you, but as you well know, I?d have to shoot you.

Aside from its few oversights, ?K19? is nonetheless highly entertaining while at the same time shocking. To know that the onscreen atrocities of ?K-19? have actually taken place appalls me because the Soviets put ?the party? first, and were willing to let the Eastern Seaboard pay for their audacity. Still, it?s a movie definitely worth seeing. ?K-19: The Widowmaker? is much more than a big Hollywood would-be flick starring big names like Liam Neeson and Harrison Ford; you?ll be far more captured by the story than you will by any one character.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
24
2009
0

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008)

Box Area Guru Private showing:

Indiana Jones

Set To Conquer Multiplexes
No other films bother to direct up this weekend.

The summer movie time gets a strapping control things in the arm as the highly anticipated launch of

The new history arrives 19 years after the previous installment

Crusade

's tally would stand at savagely $330M.


Crystal Skull

will try to depart from b renounce in the coming days. The largest Memorial Heyday fete opening was generated a year ago by

At World's End

with $139.8M over the Friday-to-Monday span. That follow-up also enjoyed the biggest worldwide launch with a gargantuan $404M in six days globally. The best five-day start for any film was the $172.8M hauled in by
Reviews for

Crystal Skull

have broadly been positive. For a much-awaited follow-up with tons of hype, they are more than beneficial passably to drive in foot traffic. And if all the publicity wasn't adequate, the extra hit of signal from its star-studded superb original at Cannes only made the spotlight brighter.
Competition that Spielberg and team will face this weekend will be weaker than anyone would deliver guessed very recently a combine of weeks ago. With both

Skull

to not just rule, but to rule with an iron fist. Plus no other veil opens in roomy disenthral this weekend. The rest of the top five combined looks to gross roughly $80M during four days which would be the worst showing fitted this holiday weekend since 1999. Normally there is much more acumen in the marketplace at this in good time.
With the Thursday separation, Paramount is letting hardcore fans take care the film a bit early allowing on account of more seats through the weekend to charitable up for the cessation of the apparent. Sure it dilutes down the weekend figure, but the master plan is more about making as much money as possible and not involving setting records. Lucas launched his

Star Wars

prequels with mid-week May bows as opulently and is too old to care about commercial milestones anymore.

Skull

's Thursday may not break the slit era record currently held by

Indy

skews older more of the audience will intermission representing the weekend to see it. Typically films concentrated on digital effects spin out b elicit the biggest crowds on foot in the door hour go for

Indiana Jones

is disintegrated-school Hollywood that is more driven by stunts as though the

Caspian

may play more along the same lines as a sequel and nostalgic parents could be more in the mood to take the gang to see Dr. Jones despite the PG-13 rating. The first

Prince Caspian

, its four-day red-letter day tally this weekend could waterfall by 30% from its three-era debut and hit about $38M. That would boost the 11-day total for the fantasy flick to $107M.

Indy

Fox has had great legs for its feature-driven comedy

Pirates

and hew down $114M less than the all-out of the middle installment. Dropping to second was Paramount's

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
22
2009
0

Ray review

"Won me over because of Jamie
Foxx's powerful performance where he inhabits Charles–capturing the singer's
characteristics."

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

Director and co-author with James L. White, Taylor Hackford's ("An
Officer and a Gentleman"/"Hail! Hail! Rock 'n' Roll") hardhitting though
conventional cliché-ridden biopic on the legendary Ray Charles,
who died at 74 this June, won me over because of Jamie Foxx's powerful
performance where he inhabits Charles–capturing the singer's characteristics,
love of music, flawed life, suspicious nature, embittered fight over segregation,
sinful attititude and struggles to reach the top at any cost. It has little
to say that is impactful about psychology or social history other than
some facile observations about Ray's soul scarred from a rough childhood
and the filmmaker taking a few jabs at the dishonesty of the music business.
It works its way through its formulaic moments by just moving along with
a new event in Ray's life at every turn and another song played–with the
lip-synched singing expertly achieved. Ray is depicted as an American treasure
but also a heroin addict, womanizer, and cold-hearted businessman who knew
how to get ahead in the record business. 

The film chronicles the singer's humble beginnings as a child raised
in rural north Florida (he was born in Albany, Georgia), his tough love
relationship with his single parent mom, and the trauma of losing first
his younger brother George in a drowning accident then his eyesight due
to glaucoma at the age of seven. The overlong story is saved from tedium
by the continuous tracks of music spicing things up considerably, which
include such familiar crowd pleasers as "I Got a Woman," "Unchain My Heart,"
"Hit the Road, Jack," "What'd I Say," "Georgia on My Mind," "Doin' the
Mess Around," "Born to Lose," and "Hallelujah I Just Love Her So." 

Ray's climb to international icon status begins on the chitlin'-circuit
dance halls where he's perceived as a Nat King Cole-style singer (anything
to please the crowd) but becomes an innovator by fusing the sounds of gospel
and the blues (soon he taps into all musical styles), which enables him
to rise to the top spot on the pop and R&B charts. His rise to fame
and fortune is attributed to taking chances by striking out on his own
and great rapport with the audience. Ray started his showbiz career in
the 1940s as a sideman piano player/singer and reached the top in the 1960s
when he formed his own group signing with Atlantic Records and then going
on to even more success when signing with major record company ABC-Paramount
(Charles was allowed to keep ownership of his master tapes, something even
Sinatra didn't have). The narrative returns from time to time to dream-like
flashbacks of events during Charles's childhood that left him traumatized–many
surreal shots of him visualizing water. The film follows a good chunk of
the first half of Charles's 56-year career–until he got arrested in Montreal
for drug possession (his second brush with the law) and his successful
rehab to get off heroin in the mid-60s (supposedly remaining clean for
the rest of his life). The film suddenly ends with Charles in withdrawal
and returning as a model citizen to live with faithful, long-suffering
wife Bea (Kerry Washington) in their Beverly Hills mansion. Wifey endured
knowing about Ray's backup singer girlfriends Margie Hendricks and Mary
Ann Fisher, and the child hubby had in secret with Mary Ann.

Ray is a solid biopic about paying the price to achieve success and
overcoming a disability to become one of the country's most beloved performers,
but it never rises above its limited ambitions despite Foxx's Oscar quality
performance.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
21
2009
0

Flyboys (2006)

"Just what we need during these
dark times, an empty film that glorifies war."

Reviewed by Dennis Schwartz

Just what we need during these dark times, an empty film that glorifies
war. It tells the true story of the legendary 1917 Lafayette Escadrille,
a French squadron of international fighters (it was shot in England), through
the eyes of American flyers who volunteered to fight for France before
America entered World War I at a time when planes were primitive. The boys
are inexperienced but manage to become brave flyers, who just love the
action of those dogfights–shot as a computer-generated video game fantasy
(The special effects are by Double Negative, who also did the CGI for "Harry
Potter and the Goblet of Fire"). Tony Bill ("Five Corners"/ "Untamed Heart"),
who happens to be a pilot and WWI enthusiast, keeps it filled with an unbearable
endless supply of clichés and has no trouble moving from lame comic
set pieces to superficially told horror of war stories to a bland soap
opera romance. It felt like it stole the heart out of many other such formulaic
war tales, but couldn't get any heart into its formulaic telling. This
clinker was so lackluster and the acting so atrocious, it makes Howard
Hughes' 1930 nonsense tale about flying aces, Hell's Angels, look like
a serious work of art in comparison. The original screenplay by Phil Sears
and Blake Evans, plus writer David Ward, make everything trite, sappy and
predictable. It telegraphs every banal and sentimental message sent and
by the end proves it has no agenda but to entertain with escapist dogfight
scenes.

The featured American thrill-seekers who come aboard in 1916 in Verdun
and fight with the Lafayette Escadrille are: an orphaned pretty boy cowboy
from Texas, who just lost his family's big spread, Blaine Rawlings (James
Franco), and had to get out of town in a hurry after punching out the banker
responsible for the foreclosure and decides to join after watching a newsreel
in a movie theater; wealthy fat boy Briggs Lowry (Tyler Labine), who got
the boot from Harvard and thinks he can prove himself to his stuffy dad
in France's war; an American Negro boxer fighting in France, Eugene Skinner
(Abdul Salis), who joins because he wants to show his appreciation to France
for not being prejudice; your run-of-the-mill screw-up looking for the
military to straighten him out, but who arouses suspicion because he's
a German-American, gave a false name and can't shoot worth a lick, Eddie
Beagle (David Ellison); a young Nebraska man from a family of military
heroes who must also be a hero, William Jensen (Philip Winchester); a Bible-toting
Christian named Lyle Porter (Michael Jibson); and their world weary brave
but mysterious squadron leader, Reed Cassidy (Martin Henderson), who is
not yet thirty but has seen so many pilots killed that he becomes a loner
and a big drinker, raises his glass for endless bawdy toasts to his fallen
comrades and goes to the local whorehouse to forget his troubles. They
are under the supervision of the very French Captain Thenault (Jean Reno),
who mocks the Americans for not speaking French but applauds them for their
spunk to come here and fight–therefore will bend the rules for them at
times.

Rawlings becomes the de facto leader of the American misfits, and
begins a romance with a pretty local farm girl living nearby, Lucienne
(Jennifer Decker), who is not able to speak English. The rest of the scenes
break down between many dogfights in the personal rigged biplanes, a battle
with a dirigible on a mission to bomb Paris (where the film climaxed and
should have ended, thereby cutting off something like 30 belabored minutes),
and it eventually builds to the expected one-on-one dogfight between the
ace American flyer and the German ace, called the Black Falcon (Gunnar
Winbergh)–which didn't seem all too exciting. 

The material was stale, the film lifeless, and at well over two hours
it makes for an arduous watch. These flyboys suffer no disillusionment
that the war billed as the one "To end all wars" didn't live up to expectations.
It's the kind of safe war film that Bush, Saddam and the current crazy
guy who is head of Iran can all probably find agreeable.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
18
2009
0

This joyfully raunchy film is…

This joyfully raunchy film is a surprise to anyone not familiar with how racy pre-Code fims could get. In fact, it was a surprise to me, and I should have known better that "anything goes" was the motto of Hollywood in the happy days between the introduction of sound and the enforcement of the Production Code. From the first frames until the last winkingly cynical scene,

Ernst Lubitsch

and

Maurice Chevalier

invite us along as they thumb their noses at propriety.

Chevalier, who was a funny-looking guy, plays Niki, a Viennese lieutenant who has a way with the ladies. We first meet him as he's roused from bed to admit a buxom young woman, and Lubitsch uses a time-lapse shot of a streetlight to let us know that she's stayed the night. Niki seems to spend most of his time, whether awake or asleep, in bed, and he's seldom lonely. One night, his nervous, married friend Max (

Charlie Ruggles

) asks him to come along as Max attempts to court a violinist in a beer garden band. Niki decides that the girl looks just like Max's wife: "Just picture your wife 15 years younger, 20 pounds heavier, hair dyed, nose operated on… same girl." Franzi (

Claudette Colbert

) doesn't find Max very attractive, but every woman finds Niki attractive, and she's no exception. He romances her on a long walk through a park, while dozens of soldiers leap from their love nests to salute their superior officer. We're used to classic films in which the lovers fall in love and marry at an amazing pace; this film has more earthy opinions, and the "let's get married" conversation instead addresses whether they should wait 24 hours to make love. The hilarious and double-entendre-filled song "Breakfast Table Love" answers the question admirably.

Niki finds himself in trouble when, at a parade to welcome the Flausenthurm royalty, he smiles at Franzi in the crowd just as the royal carriage passes, and Anna is sure that the impetuous Viennese cad has laughed at her. Niki has to go before a special jury?an angry King Adolph?to defend himself. The quick-thinking Niki, recognizing Anna's inferiority complex, informs her that he was smiling at her because of her great beauty. Anna is charmed, and things progress quickly: first Niki is the official Viennese escort to the king and the princess, and then he's Anna's fiancé, much to Niki and Franzi's chagrin.

When Niki and his future wife and in-laws return to Flausenthurm, the humor and raciness kick into high gear. The funniest scene in the film, and perhaps one of the funniest scenes in classic Hollywood, comes when the royal bedchamber is prepared, including the ceremonial arrangement of the pillows on the conjugal bed, first next to each other and then on top of each other. But there's a problem: as Niki puts it, "you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink!" He refuses to consummate the marriage, choosing instead to remain aloof as his bride weeps. When Franzi turns up at a local beer garden, they renew their enthusiastic affair, Niki's new royal powers coming in handy when they need a guard at their adulterous door.

The film has it all, and most of it is right out on display?premarital sex, promiscuity, adultery. Even lesbianism is suggested: a note that reads "It may interest you to know that she's a blonde" can mean nothing else. Some of the songs don't work: I especially disliked Chevalier's first song, "In the Army," which he sings into the camera. Sometimes his exaggerated Frenchness is off-putting. In fact, until this film, I really didn't like him. I've changed my mind, though. He's a marvel here, a smirking, thoughtless cad, even when he's attempting to do the right thing?the right thing sometimes comes as a surprise. Even the film's seemingly conservative ending, which restores the sanctity of marriage, is enjoyably galling to our sense of who should end up with whom. This is one of Lubitsch's best films, and that's saying a lot. It has his style, his grace, his oblique sense of humor, and his winking naughtiness?"the Lubitsch touch," in short.

The film was nominated for a lone Oscar, Best Picture, which it lost to

Grand Hotel


.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
17
2009
0

One of the surprise hits with …

Inseparable of the their heels hits with foreign crix at the Pusan fest, "The Quiet Family" is a sly, genuinely anarchic comedy of escalating error about an "average" Korean family whose way of doing business would fool actuality Ed Gein pause for memories. Credited locally with reviving the dormant horrorgenre in Korean cinema, it's actually more like a modern-day slice of Luxurious Guignol. Specialized tube sales could follow latenight celebration dates.

Seen through the eyes of 17-year-old daughter Mi-na (Go Ho-kyung), story centers on the Kang family, who sink their savings into an isolated cottage in the hills that they name Misty Lodge, and nervously await their first guest. When he turns out to be a weird hobo and is found dead the next morning of apparent suicide, the father (Park In-hwan) decides they must bury the corpse if business is to continue. Unfortunately, their next customers are a young couple who commit double suicide after a night of passionate lovemaking, so they're soon pushing up daisies, too.

Thereafter, things go from bad to worse. One of the Kang daughters, Mi-su (Lee Yeon-sung), is almost raped in the woods by a hiker until her brother, Yeong-min (Song Kang-ho), steps in and uses the would-be rapist for compost as well. And when the government decides to build a road right in front of the lodge, the family hurriedly has to find another location for its growing collection of cadavers.

The family finally tips over into total madness when Kang Sr. is asked by a business friend, Park, if he can use the out-of-the-way lodge to get rid of his aged father's gold-digging new bride. The plan goes chaotically awry when the Kangs mistake the identity of Park's hired assassin (Lee Ki-yeong).

Casting some of the roles against type, and playing the whole thing as a perfectly normal episode in the life of an economically strapped family (though script was written prior to the Asian meltdown), former legit writer-director Kim Ji-un, 34, draws wonderful ensemble playing from his cast. (One nice running joke is Mi-su being totally unaware of what her crazy family is up to.)

Pic doesn't labor its multitude of subtexts — the sanctity of family solidarity, the capacity for sudden violence in buttoned-up Korean society — even though, in the movie's creepy final shot, the audience is left in no doubt that this isn't just a straightforward comedy. Film's look is generally unfussy, with subdued, sometimes muddy color that's fitting in the circumstances.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
15
2009
0

America at War Megaset review

The Depiction Channel has released a massive re-packaging of 37 (!) of their previously released television documentaries, examining and celebrating the American soldier and our most important military engagements in America at Engage in combat with, a 14-disc compilation that starts at the beginning - the American Drastic - and goes right from one end to the other to our current conflict in Iraq. Ceaseless an astounding 32-return hours in out-and-out, America at Combat is a hammer-embroider primer for anyone looking to move away a first-rate, general overview of America's old times military exploits. Filled to the brim with expert commentaries by historians, writers, and the actual soldiers and commanders who possess fought our wars, as well-head as solid re-creations of historical events, vintage archival battle footage and newsreels, apposite artwork and prints, as well as first-child narratives, the documentaries in the America at Contention fighting boxed impute serve as a terrific starting point owing students and scholars who are looking to inaugurate their studies, as well as providing compelling viewing for armchair academics and past buffs looking as a remedy for entertaining examinations of the highlights of American military history. Let's look at the specific offerings in this marvelous behemoth of a boxed stiffen.

VOLUMES ONE - THREE: THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR

The American Revolution: The Conflict Ignites
Before the "shot heard around the world," better known as the Battle of Old North Bridge, the conflict that erupted into the American Revolutionary War began as a war of ideas. With the passionate support of activists like Patrick Henry and Samuel Adams, as well as statesmen like Benjamin Franklin, the economic credo "no taxation without representation" swiftly evolved into rallying cries of "Liberty or death!" and grand revolutionary themes such as "All men are created equal."

The American Revolution: 1776

The Virginian George Washington, selected by the Second Continental Congress to command the Continental Army, was the first of many brilliant military leaders to answer the call of Liberty. As Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys, alongside others, took on the British at Ticonderoga and Quebec, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Jefferson shaped history in Philadelphia by drafting the Declaration of Independence.

The American Revolution: Washington and Arnold
On Christmas night 1776, Washington led twenty-four hundred cold and weary warriors across the Delaware River. This masterful attack on Trenton turned the tide of the war, building momentum for General Horatio Gates' and Benedict Arnold's subsequent triumph at Saratoga. Across the Atlantic, Benjamin Franklin waged an equally important - and successful - campaign to convince the French Court to recognize his fledgling nation and declare war on beleaguered England.

The American Revolution: The World at War

The war in the American colonies caused ripples around the world as France and Spain saw an opportunity to capitalize on the economic and military pressure bearing down on their traditional enemy, Great Britain. At Valley Forge, Washington's men were trained under Prussian military instructors, preparing them for the inspiring Battle of Monmouth. Meanwhile, frontiersmen George Rogers Clark and Daniel Boone waged a merciless insurgent campaign on America's Western Frontier.

The American Revolution: England's Last Chance
As the war lurched into its fifth bloody year, Benedict Arnold made a deal with the British to hand over the "key to the continent" - West Point. At sea, American privateers crippled British commerce, while France and Spain waged a naval war on Britain in the West Indies. Brutal leaders like Banastre "The Butcher" Tarleton helped the British dominate the South, until Nathaniel Greene forced Commander Cornwallis to retreat to Virginia.

The American Revolution: Birth of the Republic

At the Battle of Cowpens, General Daniel Morgan destroyed the bulk of Tarleton's legion, allowing Nathaniel Greene to drive Cornwallis all the way back to Virginia. Seizing opportunity, Washington leveraged French naval power to a decisive victory at Yorktown. The war officially ended with the Peace of Paris, which secured American independence. The Constitutional Convention drafted the historic document that united the victorious colonies as "We, the People of the United States."

Lavishly produced on-location in 1994 with a comprehensive sweep heretofore unseen for a documentary on our nation's birth war, writer Don Cambou (a veteran producer of TV docs, including the terrific series, Modern Marvels) and director Lisa Bourgoujian have fashioned a quickly-moving 293 minute examination of the causes that led up to the War of Independence, as well as the pertinent battles and events that shaped the long, long conflict, and their aftermaths. It's shameful to admit, but I confess knowing far too little about the single most important event - both politically and militarily - in our nation's history (school never seemed to bring this critical historical period to life for me), so I was genuinely impressed (and enlightened) with the overall scope and depth of this project.

Utilizing the standard A&E documentary format of 1): a re-created scene or staged battle, followed by 2): a "talking head" expert explaining said re-creation before setting up the next one, to 3): a representative painting, or print, or shot of an historic building for illustration of the discussed event or theme, followed by 4): perhaps an authentic diary recitation, read by some famous actors (Kelsey Grammar, Charles Durning, Michael Learned, Cliff Robertson, Rick Schroder, and William Daniels lend their particularly heavyweight acting chops to this production), The American Revolution presented not only the familiar signposts of our war against Britain (Paul Revere's ride, John Adams championing George Washington to the Continental Congress), but also highlighted "side events" (which are by no means lesser for not being less-well known) that I found fascinating. "Forgotten" (i.e.: not remembered or learned by me) figures such as the heroic, incongruous book seller Henry Knox, who managed to lumber 50 cannons through a grueling snow storm to Fort Ticonderoga's battlements, was an incredible feat of unlikely engineering and raw courage; or Israel Putnam being named as the author of the stirring cry to battle we've all heard, "Don't fire unto you see the whites of their eyes!" at the Charlestown Peninsula fort; or the detailing of Benedict Arnold's incredible foot campaign to march on Quebec (I had totally forgotten we even engaged on Canadian soil during the war); or Abigail Adams' letter to her husband John, threatening a female revolt (!) if women weren't included into the Revolutionary equation. If I had heard or read about these events before, I didn't remember them, but The American Revolution brought them vividly to life for me (my older teen was particularly fascinating as well by this section of history - a period he too stated isn't properly covered in school).

Expert historians, authors, and commentators such as General John Galvin, George F. Scheer, Piers Mackesy, Thomas Fleming, Gordon S. Wood, Dave Palmer, Don Higginbotham, Nicholas Rodger, R. S. Stephenson, Janice Potter-Mackinnon, Jonathan Dull, Anthony Tommell, Dr. Gary Wheeler Stone, Howard E. Mitchell, and Barbara Oberg guide us through the conflict (which was far more intricate and delicate and decidedly not "inevitable" - often times on the verge of defeat - than is usually portrayed in other docs), bringing in peripheral events, as well, that deepened this revolutionary portrait (I found the discussion of guerilla warfare west of the traditional 13 colonies to be particularly fascinating, as well as the fact that European powers continued to fight in the West Indies two years after colonial hostilities ceased). Gorgeously shot by I-Li Chen and Dan Waymack (although the video quality of this transfer leaves a lot to be desired), with appropriately stirring music by Zeljko Marasovich and Christopher L. Stone, The American Revolution flies by during its nearly five-hour running time, no doubt aided by the snappy editing of Michael Andrews and Stephen Pomerantz. Focusing on not just the military aspects of the war, but also heavily on the root causes that inspired the colonists to revolt (some of which may surprise the viewer), The American Revolution is a necessarily primer and terrific starting point for anyone interested in the roots of this country's tumultuous birth.

VOLUME FOUR: THE ALAMO

The Alamo: Remember the Alamo
As a half-century of hostilities erupted in the Texas Revolution, a small group of filibusters, Texians, and Tejanos made a desperate stand against Santa Anna's army in a small San Antonio mission. Meanwhile, behind the scenes, politicians and diplomats wrangled over the rich territories of Texas and Florida. How should the Alamo be remembered? Depending upon who tells the story, the epic battle is related as either a tale of courageous freedom fighters, or of rebellious traitors.

Leaving behind the War of 1812, as well as the various Indian Wars, the America at War box set now moves on to the battle of the Alamo, with this 2003 documentary, Remember the Alamo. Bracketed by an intro and exit by actor Dennis Quaid (including a few brief clips from 2003's The Alamo feature film release), Remember the Alamo is a nicely dense re-examination of this complicated "myth" that still has a hearty resonance today in America's on-going conflict with illegal Mexican immigration. Directed by veteran TV documentary writers and directors Joshua Alper and Darryl Rehr, (there is no writer's credit for the doc) Remember the Alamo tries to lift off the veil of mythology that has permeated this oft-told tale - not for the purpose of denigrating the memory of the event and for the combatants who took part in this rallying cry for Texas statehood, but to give a more thorough (and infinitely more interesting) look at the political, social, and cultural currents that weave their way through this seminal moment in American history. Needless to say, those weaned on this historical event only through the annual TV showings of John Wayne's entertaining 1960 epic, The Alamo (present) will no doubt be surprised at the far more labyrinthine forces that shaped this massacre.

Through the extensive use of 3D CGI graphics of the Alamo fort as it originally stood, as well as some nicely mounted battle re-creations, the producers of Remember the Alamo don't forget to detail the actual battle itself, in their discussions of the political and cultural forces that shaped the events. Myths exploded here include the notion that this was a "Mexican versus Anglo" conflict (actually, Texas-born Mexicans fought alongside their white compatriots), as well as the notion that the Texas settlers were at war with the government of Mexico right from the start (in fact, the "impresario policy" that helped populate the soon-to-be state of Texas was a generous land offer to settlers, in exchange for loyalty to the Mexican state, as well as requested adherence to the Catholic church - something the settlers initially agreed to wholeheartedly).

The other side of the campaign - specifically the turn of General Santa Anna from a Federalist enforcing the policies of the Mexican government, to an eventual dictator - is explored in detail as well in Remember the Alamo. While most lessons and books I remember as a boy about the conflict centered on the heroic exploits of Jim Bowie, Colonel William Travis and of course Davy Crockett (let's be honest: I remember the Disney films more than the school lessons), Remember the Alamo necessarily looks closely at the Mexican side of the conflict (and their justifications, too), giving a far more comprehensive, engaging discussion of the battle than I've ever seen (including a good wrap-up, where the battle is discussed in terms of its pop culture references). Expert historians, writers, and commentators including James Crisp, Gene Smith, Raul Ramos, Stephen Hardin, Richard Flores, Bruce Winders, William Davis, Randolph Campbell, Richard Santos, Josefina Vazquez, and Alan Huffines all lend their various takes on the battle, edited into the documentary in standard "talking heads" action/reaction method. It's a good looking documentary (perhaps some production money from the 2003 feature film was utilized to hook the documentary as a promotional tie-in?), running 1:31:20.

The Alamo: The Real West: The Battle of the Alamo

The Alamo is nearly unrivaled in American history as a steadfast symbol of courage and self-sacrifice. Narrator Kenny Rogers reveals the true lives of the men behind the legends - men like Davy Crockett, Jim Bowie and William Barret Travis - whose real ambitions, miscalculations and undeniable heroics were just as compelling as the tall tales that have long been told about them.

Taken from the 1992 cable series, The Real West, The Battle of the Alamo is a shorter, faster moving (and perhaps a tad more surface) examination of the famous conflict, in comparison to the first doc on the subject. But it is by no means a less interesting effort. Directed by Craig Haffner and produced by vet TV doc writer and director Arthur Drooker (Dogfights and Shootout!), The Battle of the Alamo runs 47 minutes, and in its trim run time, it covers quite a bit of ground, giving the viewer some interesting details that they won't find in the first, more extensive documentary (such as Santa Anna's personal vendetta against the Alamo defenders, due to the loss of his brother-in-law there prior to the final conflict). Historians and authors Paul Hutton, Stephen Hardin, Bill Chenerka, Kevin Young, Walter Lord, Joe Musso, and Gilberto Hinojosa all provide insightful commentary, while the production, nicely mounted, may seem familiar in its location work, considering it was filmed partially at Happy Shahan's Alamo Village complex, in Bracketville, Texas - the still-standing set where John Wayne shot his ode to this stirring historical battle.

VOLUME FIVE & SIX: THE CIVIL WAR

Civil War Combat: The Hornet's Nest at Shiloh
On the morning of April 6, 1862 at Pittsburg Landing, Tennessee, Confederate forces under Generals Johnston and Beauregard launched a surprise attack that nearly defeated Grant's Army of the Tennessee. Confusion on the Confederate lines and last-minute Union reinforcements gave Grant the victory, but with over three thousand dead and nearly twenty-thousand wounded, the two-day Battle of Shiloh showed both sides of the brutal face of a war that had barely begun.

Civil War Combat: The Bloody Lane at Antietam

On September 17, 1862, Union General McClellan - possessing superior numbers, an advantageous position, and his opponent's battle plans - managed, through an excess of caution and poor execution, to turn an overwhelming rout of Confederate forces into a "strategic victory." In that one day, more Americans were killed in battle than on any other day in the nation's military history. The battle of Antietam halted Lee's advance into Maryland - but cost McClellan his career.

Civil War Combat: The Wheatfield at Gettysburg
Ordered by General Meade to take a position at Cemetery Ridge, Union Major General Sickles instead repositioned his III Corps half a mile away at the Peach Orchard, exposing his company to attack from multiple sides and forcing Meade to send waves of reinforcements across twenty exposed acres soon to be known as the "Bloody Wheatfield." After just a few hours of confusing back-and-forth battle, thousands of men lay dead or dying.

Civil War Combat: The Tragedy at Cold Harbor

In March, 1864, General Ulysses Grant took supreme command of the Union army with one goal - relentless pursuit of Confederate General Robert E. Lee. Grant and his army caught up to Lee near the crossroads of Cold Harbor, launched a nearly suicidal assault against entrenched Confederate forces, losing seven thousand men in just minutes - a battle one Rebel officer called "murder." The ten-day massacre cost the Union over twelve thousand men, but was Lee's final victory.

Taken from 1999's cable series, Civil War Combat: America's Bloodiest Battles hosted by Roger Mudd, the next four documentaries in the America at War boxed set look specifically at four famous engagements from America's bloodiest conflict, giving the viewer a terrifically detailed account of each through vivid narration, expert commentary, and graphically rendered battle re-creations by Civil War reenactors. While of course Ken Burns' The Civil War has set the bar for all such documentaries on the subject, it's not the be-all, end-all take on these hostilities, and the docs from this series are admirably concentrated on the precise set-ups, engagements and aftermaths of these battles (the politics and strategies that shape the battles aren't forgotten, but clearly, the battles themselves are the main focus here). While Burns' emotionalism certainly is compelling, these tidy little docs, written, produced and directed by Jim Lindsay and David DeVries, provide a concrete, detailed look at these engagements, told without the florid fanfare of Burns' efforts, offering a nice counterpoint to what has almost become a cliche in Burns' approach.

Narrative in nature, with voice-over accompaniment from actual diaries and letters of the commanders and soldiers involved, these docs are surprisingly grim, bloody interpretations (with an occasional dose of gore thrown in), nicely shot on-location at what I assume are the actual battle sites (an apparent smaller budget limits the number of reenactors used, but it doesn't detract from the overall effect). Commentary outside the narrative framework is less-than-usual here, with writers, historians and authorities Wiley Sword, Stacey D. Allen, Maureen Harp, Gary Gallagher, Robert Krick, D. Scott Harting, Edwin Bearss, Eric Campbell, Gordon Rhea, and E. B. Furguson lending their expertise to the proceedings. Civil War enthusiasts looking for concise, detailed accounts of the above battles will do well here, and newcomers to this monumental moment in American history will find the Civil War Combat series a sobering, relentless look at the inconceivable carnage that almost tore this nation apart. Small, tidy, and grim. On a side note: the video quality may not be the best here, but the Civil War Combat transfers do have the distinction of being the only closed-captioned offerings here in the America at War boxed set.

VOLUME SEVEN: WORLD WAR I

The Death of Glory, Parts 1 & 2
Beginning with a double murder in Sarajevo, the "War to End All Wars" set the stage for even deadlier conflicts. Battlefield chivalry and honor yielded to the impersonal U-boat and poison gas, the devastating firepower of tanks and machine guns, and trench warfare. Nations disappeared from the map of Europe as the seeds were planted for the rebirth, merely twenty-one years later, of a new and deadlier German juggernaut.

Produced in 1997 by veteran TV documentary producers Lou Reda, Sammy Jackson and Mort Zimmerman, and written by Norman Stahl with Col. Rod Paschall, director Don Horan's World War I: The Death of Glory is an excellent two-part overview of the "War to End all Wars," that mixes archival newsreel footage and actual battle camerawork with some fascinating commentary on the real causes of this horrific conflagration. I suppose if a pop quiz was thrown at me out of the blue, and I was asked what was the single cause of WWI, I would probably remember "alliances" from my high school history class. However, World War I: The Death of Glory posits that the true causes of this generational genocide were not only that handy excuse, nor necessarily opposing ideologies (although the media certainly made the most with that), but rather the efforts of empires to stabilize their holdings, gaining respect from upstart nations, plain and simple score-settling with centuries-old enemies, and of course, business.

Crammed with considerable detail as to names, dates, events, and figures, World War I: The Death of Glory, narrated by stalwart actor Fritz Weaver, manages a memorably icy, ironic atmosphere of utter senselessness as the incredible facts of this first world war are put forth (for instance, one must gape when the film states that France lost 300,000 men alone in the first three months of 1914, or that by the end of 1916, England had lost 607,000 young men in battle - facts like that stagger one's imagination). Adroitly scripted by vet Norman Stahl (the narration is almost poetic in its simplicity), World War I: The Death of Glory moves quickly, using the expert opinions of Dr. Gerhard Weinberg, Johan Ahr, Robert Crowley, Brig. Gen. Edwin Simmons, David Trask, Col. Rod Paschall, Greg Oviatt, and John Votaw to paint a portrait of utter madness and absolutely senseless slaughter in the service of country and money. It's a harrowing account, perhaps not as thorough or as polished as newer efforts on the subject, but still highly valuable as an introduction to the subject.

The Last Day of World War I

On November 11, 1918, known as Armistice Day, the "Great War" was declared over and Allied victory seemed assured. Yet thousands of men would die that day. Allied leaders, seeking promotion or vengeance, manufactured outrageous excuses to send troops against a defeated enemy. The territories won would be returned to Germany, while the soldiers were sacrificed for vanity.

Based on Joseph Persico's book, 11th Month, 11th Day, 11th Hour, this sickly fascinating documentary details the final day of World War I, where Allied and Axis commanders continued to throw soldiers at each other in one last hideous symbolic death shrug. Featuring commentary by Persico, Col. Rod Paschall, Mitch Yockelson, Greg Oviatt, this Norman Stahl-written (with an assist by Persico) doc, produced and edited by veteran doc producer Sammy Jackson, presents a vision of the Great War that encompasses all the waste and carnage that so epitomized that worthless military farrago. Hypnotic use of beautiful, haunting silver plate prints of soldiers on the front lines, this doc is a real gem among these other fine offerings.

VOLUME EIGHT & NINE: WORLD WAR II

The Last Days of World War II
Defeat after defeat sent Hitler's plans for global domination spinning inexorably out of control, and Nazi leaders scrambled to protect their treasures and secrets at all costs. Meanwhile, the advancing Allied forces discovered the unimaginable depth of Nazi depravity as they liberated the infamous extermination camps hidden in plain sight throughout eastern Europe. A string of strategic, political, and diplomatic blunders sealed the fate of the Third Reich as Berlin fell in flames and Hitler died in his bunker along with his wife and his dog. The Allies exerted a final successful push in the Pacific Theater. And on September 9, 1945, the deadliest war in human history formally came to an end. Finally, the world demanded justice at the unprecedented Nuremberg trials, as a new type of conflict loomed on the horizon - The Cold War.

Produced in 1995 by veteran doc filmmakers Craig Haffner and Donna E. Lusitania, The Last Days of WWII opens America at War's coverage of second "War to End all Wars," a worldwide firestorm responsible for the deaths of at least 60 million men, women and children. Considering the magnitude of the event, and the scores of documentaries that have been devoted to "The Big One, WWII," it would be impossible for any general boxed set devoted to the comprehensive, all-encompassing subject of "America at war" to include a broad enough selection to adequately cover this moment in history. What is presented here on WWII in the America at War boxed set is fascinating, although I question the inclusion of a doc on a specific naval altercation when more broader subjects (such as the entire Pacific campaign) are ignored.

As for The Last Days of WWII, it's chock-full of "talking heads" commentary by historians, authors, experts, soldiers, commanders, and survivors of the war who add a level of gravity and seriousness to the film that is admirable. Divided into three separate segments - Death of the Reich, Justice at Nuremberg and The Spoils of War, The Last Days of WWII tackles these three aspects of the war with a directness and simplicity that some may not call "documentary art," but which presents valuable information in an energetic and compelling manner. Death of the Reich details the Nazis "Battle of the Bulge" campaign, their scorched earth policy in Russian and in the Balkans, the Dresden firebombing incident, the Remagen bridge assault, Hitler's bunker demise, the Holocaust atrocities and the growing Russian threat. Justice at Nuremberg gives a unique look at the trials that put various Nazi leaders on trial for war crimes (there's quite a bit of courtroom footage I had never seen before), with the second half looking at the mystery of Herman Goering's suicide cheating the hangman. And The Spoils of War is a absorbing look at the Monuments, Fine Arts and Archives division of the army that went around Germany (and the Soviet-controlled zones of influence), spiriting away cash and invaluable works of art, before the Bolsheviks could appropriate them back to Russia (I had never heard of the Weisbaden Manifesto, that declared America couldn't ship valuable art objects confiscated from the Nazi treasure holds, after a disastrous publicity tour of priceless paintings in the U.S.). Commentators include Stephen Ambrose, Tom Allen, Lt. Gen. Henry Kinnard, Gerhard Weinberg, Belton Cooper, Alfred Witte, August Graf Kajeneck, David Golubitsky, Pavel Sheykhet, Moisey Dubinsky, Paul Nitze, John Keegan, Paul Shuster, Siegfried Knappe, Angela Thompson, John Iorio, Helmut Gunther, Dr. Klaus Goldman, Norman Polmar, Lynn Nichols, Forrest Dixon, Walter Farmer, Joel Fisher, Kenneth Alford, Bernard Taper, Irina Antonova, Robert Strobell, Bruce Ashcroft, Hans Amtmannn, and Michael Neufield. All in all, a very speedy, thorough going-over of the last days of the Nazi Reich.

USS Eagle 56: Accident or Target?
In April 1945 as the Allies closed in on Berlin, the USS Eagle 56, a World War I-era ship towing targets for torpedo bombers off the coast of Maine suddenly exploded, killing forty-nine officers. Survivors reported seeing suspicious naval activity around the ship, but the U.S. Government insisted it was an accident. Now, sixty years later, the government has confirmed that the USS Eagle 56 was sunk by a German submarine in U.S. waters as the Reich's final act of aggression.

An episode of the History Undercover cable series hosted by Arthur Kent, USS Eagle 56: Accident or Target?, produced by Kevin Bachar and written by Jaime Bernanke, tells the riveting story of the USS Eagle 56, a Navy training vessel that was sunk off the Casco Bay in the Gulf of Maine. An naval inquiry originally blamed the crew for a boiler malfunction, ignoring the eyewitness reports of the surviving sailors who spotted a submarine in the water after the explosion. Due to the dedication of a crusading lawyer and the few surviving navymen (Paul Lawton, John Scagnelli, John Breeze, Harold Petersen), the Navy eventually changed its ruling (unheard of) and declared the explosion the result of enemy action - allowing the sailors to receive their Purple Hearts. It's a terrific mystery, but its focus is awfully narrow for inclusion in a boxed set like this, particularly when there are so many other, larger themes that could have been covered (such as the entire Pacific campaign).

Last Secrets of the Axis

Behind the most notorious men of the Nazi regime stood the little-known geography professor Karl Haushofer, who coined the term "geopolitics," and whose obsession with Japan's cults and secret societies may have shaped Hitler's vision of global Aryan domination. Other Axis secrets included German and Italian support of a coup in Iraq that had the goal of establishing a Persian Gulf base for Japanese submarines.

Written by George Kerevan, Last Secrets of the Axis is a 2001 History Channel special that looks at the now-forgotten legacy of Karl Haushofer, Hitler's "Merlin" who may have had the single greatest influence on the Nazi leader's formative thinking in terms of geo-political theory. Frankly, I had never heard of Haushofer, so I found this piece quite compelling. Haushofer's link with Japanese secret societies (the Black Dragons, specifically, which then morphed into the modern day yakuza), and his influence in bringing together German and Japan as formidable Axis allies, is intriguing stuff (as well as Haushofer's linking of Japanese symbolism with Aryan ideals of supermen, and his role in recruiting a key German spy who tipped off the Japanese during the Pearl Harbor bombing). It's an entertaining doc, with a fascinating story to tell.

VOLUME TEN: THE KOREAN WAR

The Korean War: Making of a Bloodbath
On June 25, 1950 North Korea surged across its southern border, catching South Korea and its allies off guard. U.S. and United Nations forces acted swiftly, but faced the likelihood of a humiliating evacuation.

The Korean War: Triumph to Tragedy

With U.N. forces on the verge of defeat, Supreme Commander Douglas MacArthur masterminded a brilliant landing at Inchon. The onslaught of hundreds of thousands of Chinese troops forced the Americans to make a desperate retreat.

The Korean War: Retreat from Hell
As American forces were nearly overrun, they engaged in the largest retreat in U.S. history. By December of 1950, the Communists recaptured Pyongyang. In January, Seoul fell as both sides dug in at the 38th Parallel.

The Korean War: Bitter Standoff

American casualties mounted, as did the pressure to end the war. Truman replaced MacArthur with General Matthew Ridgeway, who retook Seoul. U.S. policy shifted from liberation to containment until the armistice of July 1953. Technically, North and South Korea were still at war.

Originally known as The Korean War: Fire and Ice, this three hour documentary from 1999, produced by veteran TV doc producer Lou Reda, and written by Norman Stahl, Joseph Alexander, and Col. Rod Paschall, is one of the best all-around documentaries on Korea, the "Forgotten War," I've ever seen. Using a plethora of first-rate newsreel and battle footage, along with some compelling expert commentary, the four-part film tells you exactly how the Korean War began, how it was fought, and how it dragged on to essentially a fifty-year-plus stalemate. And one point in the film, someone comments on the differences between the U.S. commanders and soldiers, and the Communist forces, labeling them chess players, while we Yanks were poker players. It's a brilliant observation, perfectly summing up and putting into context the mistakes and victories both sides committed.

Admirably, the doc doesn't shy away from calling a spade a spade, either, correctly identifying the occupying U.S. forces called up to Korea as weak and poorly trained and equipped (and led, at least at first), as well as calling out the North Koreans and Chinese for the barbaric, horrific atrocities they committed on South Korean civilians, U.S. servicemen - and their own men, with their military strategy of using expendable waves of human cannon fodder. It's a bracing, lucid examination of a war that seems perpetually fogged (if it's remembered at all, shamefully) in the general public's mind. Speakers on camera include Donald Gregg, Col. Robert Black, Col. Rod Paschall, Lt. Gen. Bernard Trainor, Bevin Alexander, Col. Joseph Alexander, Dr. Edward Marolda, Raymond Donnelly, Dr. Richard Hallion, Lt. Col. Sherman Pratt, Joe Cappella, Col Harry Maihafer, Col. Harry Summers, Frank Fonseca, Anthony Fernandes, Capt. Thomas Hudner, Paul Martin, Danny DiTonno, Harley Coon, Paul Stillwell, B. F. Saxton, Al Ortiz, Bernard Iammatteo, John Calvo, and Col. Robert Gerard.

VOLUME ELEVEN: THE VIETNAM WAR

Vietnam: On the Frontlines: America Enters the War
Courageous U.S. soldiers in Vietnam, both on land and in the air, faced an unrelenting enemy in bloody battles at Ia Drang Valley, Khe Sanh, Con Thien, and Dak To.

Vietnam: On the Frontlines: Tet in Saigon and Hue
In January 1968, during the Tet holiday cease-fire, the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong attacked over one hundred cities and bases in South Vietnam. The bloodiest battle, near the ancient capital of Hue, inflicted a fifty percent U.S. Marine casualty rate.

Vietnam: On the Frontlines: Ringing Down the Curtain
As Nixon withdrew troops from Vietnam, he orchestrated an incursion into Cambodia. On Easter 1972, North Vietnamese swarmed into South Vietnam.

Vietnam: On the Frontlines: The End Game

U.S. Marines rescued almost seven-thousand people - both Americans and South Vietnamese - in the hours before Saigon fell to the Communists.

A special four-part, three-hour miniseries from The History Channel, 2000's Vietnam: On the Frontlines is a gripping, nervy presentation of some of the major battles and engagements in the tragically misunderstood (read John Keegan) and fatally executed Vietnam War. Immediately jumping into battle with extensive color footage courtesy of the CBS journalists who were covering the war at the front, Vietnam: On the Frontlines presents first-hand accounts of some of the most harrowing, horrific encounters our G.I.s encountered in Vietnam. In-depth policy discussion is kept to a minimum, except for the most basic theories that directly affected practical military applications (President Johnson, misguided from the start, felt that incremental force would send a "message" - a message that got G.I.s killed and that nobody wanted to hear in North Vietnam; Nixon amped up the violence and successfully waged war against the NVA, and then left the South Vietnamese civilians holding the bag as we essentially abandoned the country with Ford), while the terrors and frightening calamities that befell the brave U.S. soldiers are rightly highlighted.

Context is limited, such as when the film discusses the falling public opinion polls about the war, but fails to mention the role the media had in fostering those opinions, including having anchormen like Walter Cronkite essentially "call" the war (but what else would you expect from a CBS co-production?). Correctly, the film does allow the G.I.s who did the fighting to comment (negatively) on the young protestors at home who offered aid and comfort to the enemy through their vilifying indictments against the soldiers in the field. Raw, sometimes stunning battle footage is featured throughout the four parts, while soldiers, commanders, journalists and historians such as Col. Cole Kingseed, Col. Harold Moore, Lt. Dennis Deal, Lt. Larry Guinn, George Forest, Col. Conrad Crane, Bob Pardo, Ed Rasmuss, Maj. David Toczek, Sgt. John Steer, Sgt. Angie Scarino, Col. Ken Smith, John Laurence, Capt. Michael Lambert, Lt. Gen. Ernes Cheatham, Bill Purcell, Lt. Gen. Ron Christmas, Robert Carroll, Col. Bob Thompson, Maurice Whitmer, Col. Myron Harrington, Norman Lloyd, Bruce Dunning, Mike Marriott, Lt. Col. Jim Kean, Kenneth Moorefield, Brian Ellis, Col. Gerry Berry, Maj. Warren T. O'Hara, and Col. Darrell Browing contributing spellbinding, first-hand reminiscences.

VOLUME TWELVE: THE GULF WAR

Operation Desert Storm: The Air Campaign
Tomahawk missiles, Stealth bombers, traditional F-111 and F-5 bombers, and Apache and Cobra helicopters cleared the way for the war on the ground.

Operation Desert Storm: The Ground War

A new generation of tanks, global positioning systems and the Joint Surveillance Target Attack Radar System (Joint STARS) allowed the coalition to carry out General Schwarzkopf's bold plan in only four days.

Operation Desert Storm: The Final Showdown
The Republican Guard made a desperate effort to stop the coalition advance, while Iraqi forces destroyed Kuwait's infrastructure and industry.

Originally entitled Beyond Desert Storm, a 2001 three-part miniseries on the 1991 Gulf War, Operation Desert Storm is a detailed examination of the political forces that converged in 1991 to convince the United Nations and a willingly coalition of Western and Arab nations to take out a defiant invader of Kuwait, Saddam Hussein. Correctly identifying the threat that Saddam's weapons of mass destruction posed to the Middle East and specifically Israel (according to U.N. inspectors and every single Western intelligence agency), the documentary is fair in acknowledging that the U.S.-led invasion had to err on the side of caution when dealing with such weapons. As well, the doc correctly identifies the feelings of disappointment and confusion that were present immediately after ground operations were suspended only 100 hours after they began, when it became apparent that President Bush, with the advice of Colin Powell, had bowed to perceived pressures concerning our Arab allies, eventually creating a worse situation in the Middle East than when Bush first invaded.

As well, the doc correctly identifies the unrealistic attitudes of the American public concerning war, fostered by the incredibly low number of combat casualties in this skirmish, attitudes that continue to hamper U.S. political decisions concerning military operations today. Leaders aren't let off the hook (General Schwarzkopf's "mother of all lies" news conference; Bush's and Powell's timidity in pursuing total victory when it was within arms' reach), while the brave soldiers and commanders who performed with such lightening speed and coordinated skill (due in part to the advanced weapons systems that were quantum leaps for the military in this war) are given their just due. Commentators include William Arkin, Maj. Gen. Dave Deptula, Col. Walter Boyne, Dr. Richard Hallion, Lt. Gen. Bernard Trainor, Andrew Leyden, Lt. Gen. Buster Glosson, Capt. David Bill,, Rick Atkinson, Gen. Chuck Horner, Lt. Col. Paul Johnson, Gen. Walter Boomer, Dick Cheney, Maj. Gen. John Admire, Maj. Gen. Ron Richard, Maj. Gen. Jerry Humble, Lt. Col. Randy Hammond, Lt. Col. Ralph Hayes, Col. Kenneth Steinveg, Col. Bill Mulvey, Michael Gordon, Lt. Gen. Fred Franks, Maj. Gen. Ronald Griffith, H. R. McMaster, Gen. John Yeosock, Lt. Gen. Thoms Rhame, Lt. Col. Merrick Krause, Philip Zeilikow, Lt. Gen. Calvin Waller, and Lt. Gen. Barry McCaffrey.

Weapons of War: Smart Bombs

America discovered a unique new war weapon: the precision-guided munitions known as "Smart Bombs." Delivering devastating payloads with unprecedented accuracy, these satellite-guided weapons could target individual buildings in central Baghdad itself, eliminating their targets while causing a minimum of civilian casualties.

An episode of the excellent Weapons at War series from 1993, hosted by Gerald McRaney, this doc looks at the smart bomb technology, as well as the integrated GPS systems and coordinated command structures that moved the U.S. military even further into the forefront as the most deadly, most efficient fighting force in the world. Smartly produced and fast-moving.

VOLUME THIRTEEN & FOURTEEN: THE IRAQ WAR

One Year Later: Invasion
From the devastating event of September 11, 2001 to President Bush's declaration against the "axis of evil," to U.N. negotiations, invasion, and the end of combat operations, this program explores what decisions were made, which worked, and why they were successful.

One Year Later: Tough Going

The air war against Iraq progressed as planned until the capture of a number of U.S. combatants, including an Apache Longbow helicopter crew and Private Jessica Lynch, reshaped the expectations held by American at home.

One Year Later: Baghdad's Doorstep
As the Third Infantry took the critical Karbala Gap and Baghdad Airport, Kurds and Special Forces moved toward Mosul and Kirkuk, and Allied planes flew two thousand sorties a day. Finally, the Third Infantry made its first foray into Baghdad.

One Year Later: Fall of Saddam
Marines helped pull down a statue of Saddam as Iraqi Army units melted away. Kurds and Coalition Special Forces captured Kirkuk and Mosul, and Task Force Tripoli took Tikrit more easily than expected.

One Year Later: Aftermath

In May 2003, as President George Bush stood in front of a banner reading "Mission Accomplished," the lack of infrastructure caused chaos in Iraq, and mass looting ensued. Soldiers taught to fight were now being trained "on the job" as occupiers while more U.S. soldiers died in post-war operations than during the war.

Certainly the most controversial of the documentaries included in the America at War boxed set, this five-part 2004 documentary looks unflinchingly at the successes and mistakes made in the beginning years of the current Iraq War, presenting a fair and balanced look at what America did wrong, and what it did right in taking out Saddam Hussein. All the major theories are presented here (in other words, the ones you won't hear on the Big Three networks), including the widely held belief at the time (including all those politicians who claim otherwise now) that all reliable intelligence pointed towards Saddam having weapons of mass destruction.

Thankfully, those conveniently forgotten, uncomfortable realities of the terrorists we were fighting are presented here by the soldiers who were actually on the ground (dual use facilities to guarantee Western mainstream media outrage at Western "aggression," the cowardly "insurgents" who routinely hid behind women and children before ducking into mosques), as well as a nightmarishly realistic evaluation of the size and scope of the problems we encountered in trying to bring democracy to Iraq; armchair gripers may find themselves silent when they see the enormity of the task facing the U.S. military in Iraq - and the overall splendid job they've done there (with an infrastructure already destroyed by Saddam's neglect, rebuilding is extensive and ongoing). There's no effort to hide the fact that the U.S. was woefully unprepared for the civil war that followed the successful ground attack (please: can we finally retire the old saw about Bush saying, "Mission Accomplished" - which he didn't - as if it somehow meant the entire job of occupation was done, as opposed to just the major assault?), but there's also an effort to show the great strides the military made after the dark days of 2004 to understand the true nature of "insurgency," and how best to counter it (a lot of blue fingers went up in the air, to the great indifference of the Western media).

Of course, this kind of even-handed treatment of the U.S. occupation will set a great many teeth on edge, but the documentary is quite cognizant in recognizing that the greatest threat the U.S. has ever faced in Iraq is its own fear of bad publicity; political decisions were made to satisfy unsatisfiable critics, and the military efforts suffered accordingly. That message - let the military do what it does best: fight - is a message our politicians on both sides of the aisle (particularly those who shrewdly conceal their contempt for the services) seem to forget, time and time again. Commentators include Lt. Col. Michael Moseley, Maj. Clint Hihote, Lt. Col. David Toomey, Harlan Ullman, Col. Larry Brown, Dr. Daniel Goure, Bruce Berkowitz, Gen. Ron Foglemann, Lt. Gen. James Conway, Lt. Gen. David McKiernan, Maj. Edward Boheman, Maj. Gen. Buford Blount, Michael Vickers, Gen. Richard Myers, Maj. John Altman, Sgt. James Birdsong, Maj. Gen. Dan Leaf, Col. Will Grimsley, Capt. James Lockridge, Capt. Matt Morgan, Maj. Brad Gavle, Lt. Col. Eric Wesley, Brig. Gen. Terry Robling, Capt. Jason Smith, Lt. Jonathan Derosier, Col. Joe Dunford, Brig. Jim Dutton, Col. Thomas Waldhauser, Sgt. Jacob Lupton, Cpl. Mike Breslin, Capt. Bob Harwood, Chief Petty Off. Randy Cook, Gen. Benjamin Freakley, Chief Warrant Off David Williams, Ronald Young, Lt. Col. John Charleton, Brig. Gen. Rich Natonski, Lt. Col. Jeffrey Sanderson, Col. Ron Bailey, Lt. Col. Glenn Sternes, PFC Patrick Miller, PFC Shoshana Johnson, Col. Jean Malone, Brig. Graham Binns, Lt. Rick Schwartz, Lt. Gen. Scott Wallace, Col. James Kowalski, Lt. Franklin Heath Freeman, Lt. Dan Francis, Capt. Brian Lewis, Sgt. James Mares, Maj. Chris Lewis, Maj. Chris Ellinger, Sgt. Orion Steele, Lt. Paul Block, Sgt. Andrea Calise, Sgt. Jarvis MacNeill, Lt. Joe Runchi, Capt. Chris Watchman, Lt. Col. Buster Howes, Lt. Col. Gordon Messenger, Maj. Gen. Pete Osman, Staff Sgt. Christopher Cerillo, PFC Patrick Riley, James Dobbins, Paul Bremer, Michael Einstadt, Judith Yaphe, Maj. Gen. Robert Scales, Sgt. Arthur Wells.

The DVD:

The Video:
The full-screen, 1.33:1 video transfers for the various documentaries in the America at War boxed set vary in quality, with the newer docs obviously faring better as far as picture clarity and color, as opposed to the some of the older titles (such as The Revolutionary War, where considerable video noise and grain is apparent. As with most History Channel releases, compression issues do crop up (particularly interlacing), but considering what these films are, video fidelity isn't the highest priority.

The Audio:
The Dolby Digital English 2.0 stereo mixes for the documentaries in the America at War boxed set are for the most part, relatively clean and crisp, with all dialogue heard correctly, but with little directional effects. With the exception of The Civil War discs, none of the docs come with optional subtitles or close-captioning options.

The Extras:
Three extras "bonus" episodes fill out discs 13 and 14: Eyewitness in Iraq, a widescreen doc featuring the still photography of mainstream journalists in Iraq; U.S. Weapons Against Iraq, a History Undercover episode from 2002 that details the many "smart" weapons planned for use in Iraq by coalition forces, during the long wait to war once Iraq's stalling tactics finally ran out (thanks, U.N.), and Iraq War: Insurgency and Counterinsurgency, a terrific examination from 2005 of the obstacles that met the unprepared coalition forces after the major assault was over, and the heroic efforts of the U.S. military to continue training the equally brave Iraqi police force to take control of their own country.

Final Thoughts:
Like it or not, we are a warrior nation, with a rich tradition of military exploits that have shaped and defined our past and our destiny. Understanding that concept is key to understanding who we are, how we came to be Americans, and where we possibly may go in the future. Certainly the documentaries in the America at War boxed set aren't of such a profound nature that they're a be-all, end-all primer on the complex notion of "America at war," but they're a good start - particularly when viewed as a whole. Scholars and students of history will find these docs stimulating starting points, while military and history buffs may enjoy another entertaining take on their favorite period in America's military timeline. The selections aren't perfect by any means, but the sheer breadth of the material covered is impressive. I highly recommend the America at War boxed set.

Paul Mavis is an internationally published vapour and television historian, a fellow of the Online Film Critics Society, and the maker of The Espionage Filmography.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |
Jul
13
2009
0

Reno 911!: Miami review

A verité riff on the ‘Police Academy’ series is the idea behind cult US sitcom ‘Reno 911!’, which, here, is stretched to breaking point inasmuch as this puerile punt at cinematic glory. Sending up the cast masculine pride and pointless scaremongering of authenticity TV shows have a fondness ‘Cops’, the film centres on the rag-business workforce of the Reno Sheriff’s Department and the fracas that ensues when they are invited to a the cops convention in Miami. An episodic narrative is used as an excuse to string together lots of mini set-pieces, including the team’s attempts at removing a dead Sperm Whale from a topless run aground, a protect chase in golf carts and a talkative paean to masturbating with the curtains open. As with Christopher Guest’s films, it’s when the characters are sensible of the camera’s presence that the funnies slowly start to emerge but, in this case, it’s from amid a comic debris of gay stereotypes, scatological absurdism and – the Hollywood comedy accessory du jour – a prosthetically-enhanced rump.

Rather than of using this rift to the big screen to potentially spread the ‘Reno 911!’ variety to a wider audience, there’s the impression that the makers have chosen to play to the gallery and merely up the levels of swearing and nudity. The trashy production values and a general broadcast of shabbiness in both performance and tete-e-tete give it the feel of a community theatre project that’s accidentally spilled onto the streets. Hopefully, the vapour will be put to death to good application as a cautionary fiction for those writers who have neglected the really that sitcoms run at 30 minutes with remarkably good reason.

Written by missybluesblog in: Uncategorized |

Powered by WordPress | Aeros Theme | TheBuckmaker.com